Christopher of Antioch

The Holy Hieromartyr Christopher, Patriarch of Antioch

Hieromartyr · Patriarch · Bishop · b. at Baghdad, early 10th century — d. 23 May 967, murdered at Antioch

Commemorated 21 May — Commemoration of his martyrdom at Antioch, 967

Christopher, Patriarch of Antioch from about 960 until 967, is the one medieval patriarch of the Antiochian see honoured as a martyr. A Christian of Baghdad named ʿĪsā, he came west into Syria as a secretary, entered the service of the Hamdanid court of Aleppo, took the monastic habit, and was raised to the throne of Antioch while the city was still under Muslim rule. He used his standing with the emir Sayf al-Dawla to obtain a reduction of the taxes on his Christian people and to rebuild and endow churches; and when the Antiochenes rose against the emir in 965 he kept faith with the ruler to whom he had given his word. That loyalty destroyed him. On the night of 22–23 May 967, a few months after Sayf al-Dawla's death, soldiers set on by his enemies in the city murdered him at supper, beheaded him, and threw his body into the Orontes. His people recovered and hid it, and when the Byzantines took Antioch in 969 it was enshrined with honour in the cathedral. His life was written within two generations by a man who had known him as a child — a rare thing in the hagiography of the Arabic-speaking Church — and it survives.

From Baghdad to the court of Aleppo

He was born, probably in the first quarter of the tenth century, at Baghdad, into a Christian family of the Chalcedonian communion — the Melkite community of the caliphate — and was named ʿĪsā. He was trained as a secretary, the profession by which educated Christians rose in Muslim administration, and moved west into Syria, where he took service under the Hamdanids: first with an official of the state, and then in the entourage of Sayf al-Dawla, the formidable emir of Aleppo whose raids against the Byzantines and whose court of poets made him the most celebrated Muslim prince of his generation. The Antiochene territory, including the city itself, lay within his authority.

Where and when ʿĪsā became a monk the Life does not clearly say, and the change of name to Christopher belongs to his tonsure. What his years as a secretary gave him, and what shaped his whole patriarchate, was a working knowledge of Muslim government and the personal confidence of the emir.

Patriarch of Antioch under Muslim rule

He was elected to the see of Antioch about 960. It was not an easy inheritance. Antioch had been in Muslim hands for more than three centuries; the patriarchs were subjects of the emir of Aleppo, their flock paid the poll-tax, and the frontier war with the Byzantines made every Christian of the city a potential suspect. Within those limits Christopher's episcopate was vigorous and, by his biographer's account, remembered with affection: he restored and endowed churches and monasteries, promoted teaching and the copying of books — the Antiochian Church of this period was beginning the great work of translating the Greek fathers into Arabic — gave largely in alms, and used his access to the emir to obtain a remission of taxation for his people, which is the act the Life dwells on most. He seems to have functioned, as the great Melkite prelates of the caliphate often did, as the recognised intermediary between a Christian population and a Muslim state.

The rebellion of 965 and the murder

In 965 Antioch revolted against Sayf al-Dawla. Christopher did not join the rising. He withdrew from the city to a monastery and remained loyal to the emir, and when the revolt was put down his position with the court was stronger than ever — and his position among his own townsmen very much weaker. There were those in Antioch who never forgave him, and who had also come to resent the wealth and influence of the patriarchate.

Sayf al-Dawla died in February 967, and Christopher's protection died with him. Warnings reached him; he did not leave. On the night of 22–23 May 967, according to the Life, men from among his enemies in the city brought in soldiers — Khurāsānians of the garrison — who found him at supper and killed him there, cut off his head, and cast his body into the Orontes. The Christians of Antioch recovered the remains secretly and kept them hidden, since the murderers held the city.

Relics and veneration

Two years later, in 969, the Byzantine army took Antioch and the city returned to the Empire after three hundred and thirty years. The patriarch's relics were then brought out of concealment and buried with honour in the cathedral church of Cassian, and his memory was kept as that of a martyr. That memory is the reason his Life was written: the biographer's purpose is explicitly to establish that a patriarch murdered for his fidelity — not, formally, for confessing Christ before a tribunal — is nonetheless to be numbered with the martyrs, and the argument was evidently accepted at Antioch.

His cult remained a local Antiochian one and did not pass into the Byzantine synaxaria of Constantinople; with the gradual replacement of the old Antiochene usages by the Constantinopolitan books, and the upheavals of the Melkite Church in the early modern period, the observance faded, and he is absent from most printed calendars today. He is nonetheless one of the most securely documented saints of the Antiochian Church, and one of the very few for whom a near-contemporary biography survives.

The Life by Ibrahim ibn Yuhanna

The source for everything above is the Arabic Life of Christopher by Ibrāhīm ibn Yuḥannā al-Anṭākī, a Byzantine official of Antioch with the rank of protospatharios and a considerable translator of Greek theological works into Arabic. He states that he knew Christopher as a child. Internal references to the patriarchate of Nicholas II (1025–1030) place the composition in the late 1020s or after — some sixty years after the events, but from a writer with direct memory and access to those who had more. He composed it, he says, in both Greek and Arabic; only the Arabic version survives. It was edited and translated into French by Habib Zayat in 1952, and has since become one of the principal documents for the history of the Melkite Church under Muslim rule and for the Byzantine reconquest of northern Syria.

Feast and commemoration

May 21 (church date; New Calendar civil May 21, Old Calendar civil June 3); some Antiochian notices give May 22. The commemoration belongs to the Greek Orthodox Patriarchate of Antioch and is not carried in the Constantinopolitan synaxaria, the printed Greek Menaia, or the Slavonic books. He is served, where he is served, with the common of a hieromartyr, joined to the great feast of the two Equal-to-the-Apostles that occupies the day.

The entry is included here because the project's constitution gives the witness of the Church of Antioch the first place among sources, and because he is that Church's own martyr under Islam. Verification against the current Antiochian Archdiocese calendar is owed and is flagged for a later pass.

Hymns

Apolytikion

Sharing the manner of life of the Apostles and seated upon their thrones, thou didst find in the practice of the virtues the ascent to divine contemplation, O inspired of God; wherefore, rightly dividing the word of truth, thou didst contend for the faith even unto blood, O hieromartyr Christopher: intercede with Christ our God that our souls may be saved.

Iconography

No pre-modern image of Christopher is known to survive, and his cult produced no established type. He would be — and in the modern Antiochian icons painted for him in recent decades is — depicted as a patriarch of the Byzantine rite: a bearded hierarch in sakkos and omophorion with the patriarchal mitra or bare-headed, blessing with his right hand and holding the Gospel in his left, and carrying as his martyr's attribute a cross or, in some modern treatments, the palm; the narrative subject available to an iconographer is his murder at table and the casting of his body into the Orontes. No image is stored here: nothing pre-1900 is known, and the modern icons of him are the copyright of their painters.

Disputed questions

The day of the commemoration. The murder is dated by the Life to the night of 22–23 May 967, and the death-date is therefore 23 May. The commemoration, however, is given in the surviving Antiochian notices as 21 May or 22 May. The reason for the displacement is not stated anywhere; the likeliest explanations are a reckoning from the evening of the attack, or attachment of the memory to the great feast of Constantine and Helen on the 21st. This entry carries 05-21 as the primary feast, following the earlier of the two attested days, but the uncertainty is real and a reader should treat the exact day as unsettled.

Martyr in what sense? He was killed in a political murder, by men who wanted him out of the way, and not after a demand that he apostatise. His biographer knows the objection and answers it: the patriarch died because he would not break faith and would not leave his flock, and the manner of his dying — at the hands of the unbelieving, in the exercise of his office — is a martyrdom of the kind the Church under Islam had learned to recognise. The Antiochian tradition followed the biographer. The classification here as hieromartyr records that tradition rather than asserting a juridical certainty about it.

Whether he was a monk before his elevation. The Life is not explicit about the circumstances of his tonsure, and modern scholars differ on whether he was professed long before his election or shortly before it.

Sources

  1. Ibrāhīm ibn Yuḥannā al-Anṭākī, Life of Christopher, Patriarch of Antioch (Arabic; composed in the late 1020s or after, by a writer who knew the saint as a child; the Greek original lost), ed. and trans. H. Zayat, Vie du patriarche melkite d'Antioche Christophore, 1952 — the sole substantial source for his life, his relations with Sayf al-Dawla, the revolt of 965, and the murder of 967.
  2. Yaḥyā of Antioch and the Arabic chronicles of the Hamdanid period, for the political background: the death of Sayf al-Dawla in February 967 and the Byzantine capture of Antioch in 969.
  3. Antiochian commemoration notices for May 21/22, and the modern literature on the Melkite Church under Muslim rule (the tenth-century Antiochene translation movement, the position of the patriarch as intermediary between community and state).
  4. Note on source limitation: no live Antiochian Archdiocese calendar page could be read at authoring time (antiochian.org is script-rendered), and the day of the commemoration therefore rests on the secondary literature. See the project's record of open questions, "Antiochian/GOARCH live witness."